Agreement In Old Testament

Agreement In Old Testament

In the Christian context, this new covenant is associated with the word “will” in the sense of a “will after the death of a person”, with instructions for the inheritance of property (Latin testamentum)[25] of the original Greek word, used in the Scriptures, in the diatheque ([26], which, in the Greek context, means only “wants (after death)” and never practically “alliance”. Alliance.” [27] This fact implies a reinterpreted vision of the Old Testament Covenant as a “will after death” qualifying in Christian theology and has attracted the attention of biblical scholars and theologians. [28] Reason is related to the translation of the Hebrew word for the covenant, brit () in the Septuagint: see “Why the Testament Word” in the New Testament article. 1st millennium BC Alliances. Several extra-biblical texts describe covenants of the first millennium BC in which the cutting or killing of an animal represents what would happen to a vassal that violated its agreement with the king. This is demonstrated by similar curses in contracts where the injurious vassal is graphically identified as “like” or “like” a slaughtered animal. From the 8th century BC If we have a contract between King Barga`yah and Matti`el, which contains this statement: “[How] this calf is cut, Matti`el and his nobles will be cut off.” [21] Note the slaughter of a calf as part of the covenant and curse – Matti`el and his companions are like a cut calf when they break the agreement. What is the agreement between the temple of God and the idols? For we are the temple of the living God; As God said: I will make my abode among them, and I will walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people. We have already seen that the old covenant was a marriage agreement between the ancient nation of Israel and God. God spoke to Moses and Israel when he released the conditions of action. But Christ said: And the Father himself who sent me gave me witness to me.

You have never heard his voice or seen his form” (John 5:37). We have already seen some critical points that we should remember: 1) A confederation is an agreement between two or more parties. The old covenant was the agreement between God and the ancient nation of Israel; 2) The terms of the old covenant were clearly spelled out: God would be the God of Israel if they obeyed His voice. Later, we will see the peculiarities of Israel obeying the voice of God; 3) The Alliance`s promises were also clear. Not only would he be the God of Israel, but he would make him a special treasure, a kingdom of priests and a sacred nation. In other words, they would be inundated with great material blessings like no other nation in the world. Other characteristics that go beyond them cannot be considered fundamental. This is the case with the installation of a stone or the heaving of a pile of stones (Ge 31:45-46). It is probably an old custom that has nothing to do with the covenant, but comes from the ancient Setifian conception of the sanctity of stones or piles of stones.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.